BKR Capital Fund II announced Monday it has raised CA$20 million, roughly $14.5 million, against a CA$50 million target. The Toronto-based firm, which backs technology companies founded by Black entrepreneurs, plans a final close in December. That gives managing partner Lise Birikundavyi about six months to raise the remaining CA$30 million, in a Canadian venture market that has been tighter than most GPs would like.
The math on the gap matters. A fund that closes at 40% of its target has a different portfolio construction than one that closes at 100%. BKR Capital Fund II is targeting investments in 25 companies, with checks between $250,000 and $1.5 million. At the midpoint of that range, deploying into 25 companies requires roughly $21 million in investable capital after fees. The current close gets them there, barely, if the final close doesn’t materialize. Birikundavyi did not signal any retreat from the target.
BKR Capital Fund II and the Arbitrage Case for Overlooked Founders
The firm’s investment thesis is the more interesting story. BKR Capital launched in 2021 and closed its Fund I at $22 million. Birikundavyi says Fund I is performing in the top quartile relative to comparable vintage funds, outperforming at least 75% of funds launched around the same period. That claim is unverified by a third party in this announcement, but if accurate, it is the kind of track record that moves LP conversations from polite interest to term sheets.
BKR Capital Fund II targets high-growth tech companies focused on the future of work, living, and global connectivity. The firm looks primarily at Canada but will back select companies elsewhere. That geographic flexibility is not accidental. Birikundavyi points out that nearly 70% of Canada’s Black population is first- or second-generation immigrant, producing founders who build for international markets from the start rather than treating global expansion as a later-stage problem. The argument is straightforward: if your founder already has cultural fluency and personal networks across three continents, your Series A doesn’t need to fund a market entry strategy that a domestic-born founder would require.
That is the arbitrage framing Birikundavyi is using, and it is a sharper pitch than DEI compliance.
The DEI Reframe Behind BKR Capital Fund II’s LP Pitch
The U.S. venture market has spent the last 18 months watching DEI-focused funds navigate a hostile political environment. Several American firms have quietly rebranded their diversity mandates or dropped explicit demographic language from their LP materials entirely. Canadian venture capital is a different market with a different political temperature, and Birikundavyi is leaning into that distinction.
Her framing: this is not a DEI fund. It is an arbitrage fund that happens to focus on a structurally undercapitalized segment of the founder population. Overlooked founders mean underbid deals. Underbid deals mean better entry valuations. Better entry valuations mean better returns, assuming the companies perform. The logic holds if the portfolio does.
That reframe matters for LP conversations in 2025 and 2026. Pension funds, family offices, and institutional allocators who were comfortable with DEI mandates three years ago are now running those commitments through a different political filter. A fund that can make the case on pure return potential, without asking LPs to take a reputational or political position, has a wider fundraising surface area. BKR Capital Fund II appears to be making exactly that case.
The BDC Capital ecosystem and programs like the federal Black Entrepreneurship Program have seeded a growing number of Black-led tech companies across Canada over the past five years. BKR Capital Fund II is positioned to catch companies that graduate out of grant funding and early accelerator support but are too early for the larger Canadian VC funds to pay attention to. That is a real gap. The Toronto startup ecosystem has grown fast enough that the gap is filling with companies, even if the capital hasn’t kept pace.
BKR Capital Fund II expects its final close by December. Between now and then, Birikundavyi needs to raise CA$30 million more while simultaneously sourcing, diligencing, and potentially closing early deals from the fund. That is a dual workload familiar to every emerging manager who has tried to fundraise and deploy at the same time.
The fund’s final size will determine whether this is a proof of concept or a platform. December will answer that.





